Level 6/8 Help St, Chatswood NSW 2067Registered from 27 Nov 2024

contact@uriahinvestment.com.au+61 430 166 639

Cross-border reporting pack

Consolidated AUD view for assets held in Australia, Singapore, and USD custody accounts.

Cross-border reporting pack — illustrative photograph

Difficulty

The client received three incompatible statements monthly, each in local currency with different performance methodologies. Family office staff spent days reconciling before any strategic discussion. FX translation was inconsistent quarter to quarter.

Multi-currency consolidation
Office printer with report stack

Approach

We defined a single reporting currency (AUD), fixed FX sources and valuation timestamps, and mapped every holding to strategic buckets regardless of custodian. Performance was reported as money-weighted where cash flows were material, with footnotes explaining limitations on offshore delayed pricing.

Resolution steps

  • Custodian data feeds normalised to a master security ID table.
  • Quarterly “reconciliation exceptions” page listing breaks >0.5% NAV.
  • IPS updated to include offshore concentration and currency limits.

Effect

Preparation time for board-style family meetings dropped materially. Strategic debates shifted from “which number is right” to allocation decisions. Tax residency questions remained with external advisers; our pack supplied consistent inputs.

Questions about this cross-border reporting

Why a master security ID table?
Custodians use different identifiers; normalisation prevents double counting and reconciliation breaks.
What is a reconciliation exceptions page?
Quarterly list of breaks above 0.5% NAV so clients see data issues before they become trust or tax problems.
Are FX gains modelled?
Reporting is in AUD with disclosed FX assumptions; tax treatment belongs with your tax adviser.
Can you aggregate SMSF and personal entities?
Entity scope is defined in the engagement; this case shows one consolidated reporting pack example.