Level 6/8 Help St, Chatswood NSW 2067Registered from 27 Nov 2024

contact@uriahinvestment.com.au+61 430 166 639

Fee transparency that informs decisions

All-in cost reporting so families see advice, platform, and fund layers in one place.

Fee transparency that informs decisions — illustrative photograph

Headline advice fees are easy to compare; all-in costs are not. Platform charges, fund management fees, transaction costs, and FX spreads can dwarf the adviser line item—yet many reporting packs hide them in footnotes. Clients optimise what they see.

All-in fee breakdown worksheet on a desk

How we disclose

Quarterly reports from our desk include an all-in cost page: adviser fee per agreement, weighted average fund MER where known, identifiable platform fees, and an estimate of brokerage unless custodian provides exact figures. We state what is estimated and why.

Behavioural effect

When families see combined costs, conversations shift from “are we paying too much for advice?” to “are we paying twice for the same beta?” That shift often supports consolidation of legacy accounts and a cleaner fee stack.

Engagement pricing

Our own fees are quoted in writing via the proposal process; we do not publish rate cards that ignore complexity. Transparency is bilateral: we expect clients to disclose structures we must analyse.

Fees for your situation are confirmed in a written proposal.

Related questions

General information only—not personal advice.

What is on the all-in cost page?
Adviser fee, weighted MER where known, platform fees, and estimated brokerage with estimation notes.
Do you publish rate cards?
No—proposals quote complexity-aware fees.
Why does transparency matter behaviourally?
Families optimise visible costs; hidden layers can duplicate beta exposure.